Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TW-2220: Extract fed server in well know #2221

Closed

Conversation

nqhhdev
Copy link
Member

@nqhhdev nqhhdev commented Jan 23, 2025

Ticket

Resolved

Attach screenshots or videos demonstrating the changes

  • Web:
Screen.Recording.2025-02-11.at.11.51.13.mov
  • Android:
  • IOS:

Copy link

This PR has been deployed to https://linagora.github.io/twake-on-matrix/2221

@nqhhdev nqhhdev force-pushed the TW-2220-extract-fed-server-in-well-know branch from 88063b5 to a3072a7 Compare February 5, 2025 11:35
@nqhhdev nqhhdev changed the title [WIP] TW-2220: Extract fed server in well know TW-2220: Extract fed server in well know Feb 5, 2025
@nqhhdev nqhhdev changed the base branch from main to feature/contact-sync February 11, 2025 02:59
@@ -8,5 +9,8 @@ class HiveDI extends BaseDI {
get.registerLazySingletonAsync<HiveCollectionToMDatabase>(
() => HiveCollectionToMDatabase.databaseBuilder(),
);
get.registerLazySingletonAsync<HiveCollectionFederationDatabase>(
() => HiveCollectionFederationDatabase.databaseBuilder(),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to create another database. ToM db = Twake-on-matrix db. Please create a box inside ToM db to store Fed configurations.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

@nqhhdev
Copy link
Member Author

nqhhdev commented Feb 17, 2025

Move to #2229

@nqhhdev nqhhdev closed this Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants